As with most minorities, Gays and Lesbians are often on the defensive. In fact the majority of adults believe they shouldn't have the right to enter into a marriage contract. They are to be denied the same legal protection a man and a woman receive from marriage.

Voluntary versus Involuntary Exchange

We can determine if Gays and Lesbians should have the right to enter into a marriage contract by using basic economic law.

First you have to distinguish the difference between voluntary and involuntary exchange. You must realize it is individuals who are involved in exchanges. In any two person exchange, one sells (gives) and the other buys (receives). "Society can not take part in an exchange--only individuals can."

A voluntary exchange takes place when two or more individuals agree to become involved with one another. Each participates of his own free will. The exchange could involve anything from giving and receiving love to buying and selling commodities. All believe they will benefit.

An involuntary exchange takes place when at least one party to the transaction is in it against his (her) will. Examples of this type of exchange are robbery, rape, assault and murder. Only this type of exchange can be defined as criminal. All voluntary exchanges are legitimate and non-criminal--no matter what the Absolute Moralist and Governments declare.

Practicing homosexuality is a voluntary exchange.

It is companionship. It is two people giving each other pleasure. In some cases they are in love--which is much more preferable than the intolerance, hate and war-mongering that many opponents of homosexuality support.

Since homosexual relationships are voluntary exchanges you can deduce that the participants have a right to enter into contractual agreements with each other. They have a right to be legally married. Absolute Moralists attempt to keep them apart. Of course some people care only about forcing their so-called moral code on others. They aren't concerned with whether the oppressed are happy or not. If more individuals adopted libertarian values the faulty, vicious morality of *the Absolute Moralist would disappear forever.

*The Absolute Moralist is the combination of negative emotions--and false moral and economic beliefs that people attempt to force on others.

Natural Law and Over-Population

Many consider homosexuality a moral perversion. Some go as far as condemning practicing homosexuals to hell. These beliefs are in total opposition to Natural Law.

If you believe *God created Natural Law, you have to conclude that all the moralizing against Gays and Lesbians is wrong-- since homosexuality is in harmony with Natural Law.

Opponents of Gays and Lesbians haven't considered the fact that God created some to be homosexuals. **This could be God's way of keeping the world from over-populating and languishing in poverty and starvation. If some are born Gays or Lesbians they usually won't be adding new mouths to feed to an over-populated world. They are actually doing us all a favor by practicing their sexual orientation.

Of course if they aren't born this way and decide they prefer this lifestyle--it is still perfectly legitimate since homosexual relationships are voluntary exchanges.

We can definitely state that Gay and Lesbian relationships are perfectly legitimate. They are supported by Natural and Economic Law. People who are against homosexuals practicing their sexual orientation are violating these laws. They are encased in a hate-filled world of illusion.

*You can also refer to God as Universal Mind, First Cause, the Big Bang etc.

**Much of the poverty and starvation in the world is caused by governments sabotaging the natural working order of the marketplace.